Understanding cannot be divided from the commitment to bringing knowledge to life. May it be by sharing a caring nurturance culture with our direct peers, or by adapting event flow patterns found in action research-like enquiries for harvest and dissemination of public action in spacetime.
Informing these acts with women's ways of knowing mediates social praxis after the death of dualism. Not only does uncertainty become malleable, but also do fears fade away once sustained, pragmatic manipulation embodies the various modes of understanding.
We are constructing explanations especially *because* of the mutual interest into broadening and sharpening our narrative imagination. It wouldn't be for diminuishing the detrimental effects of attentional economies, but for a lively conversation about the prepositions of ethical regulation, that we redistribute contextual seeds into the local archives of the wider social planes.
Although bias is inherent to speech acts, we can deconstruct their assumptions. *Why* certain epistems are used in a given moment, is not only a question of representations, but also of power.
Instead of fetishising artefacts and things, the produce of the individual's will, there is a much finer and more subtle world accessible by listening to the polyphony of a chorus of voices. *What* there is to know cannot be in question. Subjects and arguments come and go, when you tell a passing stranger and attentively seek links to their pathways.
The question open to elaborate shall rather be: *How* do we use our abilities to create and protect spaces of solidarity, within ourselves, connected groups of peoples and also humane population at large?
mashup